Research systems · AI-enabled research

Making research knowledge cumulative.

How I structured fragmented evidence into a traceable foundation for synthesis, retrieval and reuse.

43studies in the taxonomy
1shared evidence model
Humanreview at every claim boundary

A completed study is not the same as reusable knowledge.

Evidence existed across reports, presentations and working files. The problem was finding it, verifying it and determining whether it still answered the current question. I focused on the layer between storage and decision-making.

01

Taxonomy

A shared structure connecting topics, journeys, markets and research questions.

02

Canonical records

Quotes, figures, sample context and provenance preserved as reusable evidence units.

03

Grounded assistant

Gemini and Claude workflows restricted to approved research evidence.

04

Reusable standards

Survey, documentation and QA patterns that reduced reinvention across studies.

AI as a retrieval layer, not an authority.

Traceability before speed

Every useful output needed a path back to its source.

Evidence before fluency

A convincing answer was not accepted without support.

Context before aggregation

Market, sample, method and limitations remained attached.

Human review before reuse

Research judgment remained responsible for interpretation.

A foundation for research that accumulates instead of disappearing after delivery.

The work established a reusable evidence model and a controlled way to apply AI to synthesis, documentation and knowledge retrieval. No adoption or time-saved metric was documented, so the contribution is described as infrastructure rather than inflated impact.

Back to the first projectClarifying the bank handoff ↗